top of page
Search

DURATION vs. LIQUIDITY

J. Reindollar
Sep 15
1 min read

Updated: Sep 16

In real estate investing, there's a fundamental tension between DURATION and LIQUIDITY.


Benefits of long DURATION in a real estate fund: frictionless compounding of interest, ability to harness Operating Company Value, the power of scale, knowledge of your own assets, data / information. We've materialized this first-hand in our employee housing, neighborhood retail, and vacation rental platforms.


I feel very strongly that real estate investing performs best over long time-horizons.


BUT, it is at the expense of LIQUIDITY to LP investors, who have their money tied up for the long-term with one sponsor / investor.


Paramount to getting comfortable with DURATION: TRUST. Can you TRUST your manager. Who are they as a person. And TRUST is impossible to build in one meeting or one dinner.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Private Equity Ownership in Hospitality

Before the 1990s, real estate was mostly owned by families, developers, insurance companies, and pension funds. Closed-end, blind-pool private equity funds debuted in early 1990s. The model benefi

 
 
 
Buying Unlevered

Downside for buying small properties unlevered: lower IRR Sometimes, lower MOIC Upside: Protect basis during macro downturns Maximize whole $ profits ("you can't eat IRR") Significantly less risk of

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page